The Lineup
    
The Top 5
    
Location: BlogsJ RThe Rant    
Posted by: J R 7/25/2006

According to American standards, the 2004 version of the U.S. men’s basketball team was a disappointment. The U.S. team has a long history of Olympic basketball dominance, winning the gold medal in 12 of 14 Olympic competitions from 1936-2000. The 2004 team had a long history of sucking. There was no logical reason for that team to not win the gold or at least the silver. The roster featured a group of proven All-stars including Tim Duncan and Allen Iverson, and a group of budding superstars in LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, and Amare Stoudemire, yet they jelled as well as the Larry Brown coached New York Knicks. Was it a coincidence that Brown happened to be the head coach of that national team? Just something to ponder. Instead of dominating the competition, the U.S. brought home the bronze, finishing behind soccer powerhouses Argentina and Italy. Now that the 15 finalists for the 2006 U.S. national team’s roster were announced Tuesday, it looks like Team Director Jerry Colangelo is putting together a balanced team capable of demoralizing the competition as previous U.S. teams have become accustomed to. Instead of filling the squad with me-first players, guys with gigantic egos and a lack of anyone who could hit an open jump shot, this year’s team is filled with shooters, role-players, and team oriented players. The 2006 roster will still be cut down to 12 before Aug. 19, leaving 3 players hanging in the balance, but for the first time since the mid 90s our national team looks like an unstoppable force. The best team ever assembled in history was the 1992 Dream Team, which featured future Hall of Famers at every position. This team is a lot younger, and less experienced than the 1992 team, but the future Hall of Fame potential is still there. Here is a break down of which 2006 star is most likely to fill the role of their 1992 counterpart.

2006 Roster Finalists

Carmelo Anthony F (Denver Nuggets)

Gilbert Arenas G (Washington Wizards)

Shane Battier F (Houston Rockets)

Chris Bosh F (Toronto Raptors)

Bruce Bowen F (San Antonio Spurs)

Elton Brand F (Los Angeles Clippers)

Kirk Hinrich G (Chicago Bulls)

Dwight Howard F/C (Orlando Magic)

 LeBron James F (Cleveland Cavaliers)

Antawn Jamison F (Washington Wizards)

 Joe Johnson G/F (Atlanta Hawks)

Brad Miller C (Sacramento Kings)

Chris Paul G (New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets)

Amaré Stoudemire F (Phoenix Suns)

Dwayne Wade G (Miami Heat)

 

1992 Olympic Team Roster

Charles Barkley F (Phoenix Suns)

2006 clone: Dwight Howard

Barkley is considered to be one of the best, not to mention the nastiest, rebounders in history. If there is one thing that Howard knows how to do, it is rebounding. Only 20 years-old, Howard has already mastered the art of rebounding and is one of the best in the league at pulling down boards. If he keeps his current 11.3 rebounds/game average up, he will be right on par with Sir Charles. Look for him to keep opposing international foes from getting anywhere near the key.

Larry Bird F (Boston Celtics)

2006 clone: Carmelo Anthony

If clutch shooting was an official statistic, Anthony would be leading the league. He is quickly developing into one of the NBA’s most clutch players. Bird made a career out of making big shots. If there is one thing that the U.S. needs it is someone they can count on to make shots in a close game. While Anthony may not have the long-distant range that Bird possessed, his all-around scoring ability is extremely Bird like.

Clyde Drexler G (Portland Trail Blazers)

2006 clone: Gilbert Arenas

“Clyde the Glide” could practically float around the basketball court. He did a little bit of everything, including his signature high-flying dunks. Arenas has become the NBA’s triple-double king, plays great “D” and can soar to new heights like his counterpart Drexler. Much like Clyde, the U.S. team will count on Arenas to defend on the perimeter and break out on the fast-break.

Patrick Ewing C (New York Knicks)

2006 clone: Amaré Stoudemire

In his prime, Ewing was an absolute monster. There is no better way to describe Stoudemire. He is a freak of nature, whose basketball abilities are limitless. Much like Ewing, Stoudemire is a complete force in the paint and can throw done nasty dunks with the best of them. If he is completely healthy, Stoudemire will be a force to be reckoned with on both ends of the court.

Earvin “Magic” Johnson G (Los Angeles Lakers)

2006 clone: LeBron James

Magic was the most versatile player of his time. He could score at shooting guard, pass like a point guard, and rebound like a center. Sounds a lot like someone else I know: LeBron. In his short career, James has proven to be the best all-around player in the league. He has the tools to do all the things Magic did on the court, not to mention the same boyish smile. James and Wade have the potential to form the Magic-Jordan tandem of the next 15 years.

Michael Jordan G (Chicago Bulls)

2006 clone: Dwayne Wade

The easy choice here would be LeBron, considering the Jordan comparisons, but based on recent play Wade is a more accurate Jordan comparison. Consider that Wade plays seemingly effortless, has won a championship, become the leader of his team, and can take over games in a blink of an eye. Sounds a little bit like Michael, doesn’t it? Wade might not have the Jordan star appeal over-seas yet, but after international fans see him in China in 2008, that could very well change.

Christian Laettner F (Duke)

2006 clone: Brad Miller

(Insert “Tall, white guy joke” here). Besides skin color, Laettner and Miller don’t have much in common. While Laettner’s role on the team was strictly as a cheerleader, Miller is a legitimate center who will bring offense and great passing. He might not play much defense, but Miller’s big frame will do enough to clog up the opposition’s lane.

Karl Malone F (Utah Jazz)

2006 clone: Elton Brand

Possibly the most consistent forward ever, Malone could score around the basket and hit 15 footers with his eyes closed, not to mention rebound like an animal. Brand’s game mimics Malone’s in every way, right down to the sweet outside jumper. He goes about his game with a workman-like complex, ala Malone. Brand might never get the recognition that Malone did, but his constancy will be a huge asset to the U.S. team.

Chris Mullin F (Golden State Warriors)

2006 clone: Bruce Bowen

Mullin was the complementary glue that held the ’92 team together. While not a star, Mullin did the little things that helped his team win. He could shoot the three, guard on the perimeter, and pester opposing team’s players. Bowen does all of this and then some. He is a great outside shooter and the best defense player on the team. He will be counted on, like Mullin, to do the little things and receive little fanfare in the process.

Scottie Pippen G/F (Chicago Bulls)

2006 clone: Joe Johnson

At 6-7, Pippen was one of the most multitalented players around. At 6-7 Johnson is on his way to becoming a multitalented star himself. These two have more than height in common. Both can pass the ball exceptionally well for their size, score when needed, and are menacing on defense. Johnson might not have the impact that Pippen had on the Dream Team, but he will be a valuable asset off the bench with his well-rounded game.

David Robinson C (San Antonio Spurs)

2006 clone: Chris Bosh

A lanky, left-handed center, with a great inside-out game. Is it Robinson or Bosh- take your pick. Bosh/Robinson might be the closet thing to an exact clone of any of the other comparisons. In his career, Robinson won a scoring crown, a rebounding title and was named to the NBA All-Defensive First team three times. Bosh can already score, rebound, and is a top-notched shot-blocker like Robinson. He is the odds on favorite to lead the Olympic Games in blocked shots.

John Stockton G (Utah Jazz)

2006 clone: Chris Paul

Paul has the potential to lead the league in assists for years to come. He is the most un-selfish player since, well, Stockton. These two tiny guards will break down defenses faster than you can say “Alley-Oop.” Paul is just be a rookie, but he is the one guy who can and should lead this team to the gold medal.

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (29)   Add Comment
Re: We Got Game    By jjk on 7/25/2006
lol

Re: We Got Game    By jake on 7/26/2006
I agree that LeBron is more like Magic than like MJ. The media loves to talk it up and make the endless Jordan comparisons but it just doesn't click. When I see James, I see Magic. "Wade have the potential to form the Magic-Jordan tandem of the next 15 years." I couldn't agree more. Good call and great post all around.

Re: We Got Game    By jack on 7/26/2006
don't know about gilbert being a "triple double king".. and i guess you've never watched a bullets game...he rarely plays d......

Re: We Got Game    By doppleganger on 7/26/2006
Arenas is known for not playing defense. That's the reason why the needed to pick up Hinrich...Also, I wouldn't say Bowen is a "great" outside shooter either, he's mediocre at best. I believe this past year is the only year where he's shot the ball even decently. Other than that though, very interesting

Re: We Got Game    By Mud on 7/26/2006
I agree with the previous comment. Gil Arenas is my favorite player but to call him good at "D" or a "triple double king" shows that you do not follow the Wizards closely. His "D" is decidedly weak and although I can't quote stats, I don't think that he's had many triple doubles recently.

Re: We Got Game    By JT on 7/26/2006
Pretty big stretch on most of these. For example, in 1992 Chris Mullin averaged 26 ppg. Last season Bruce Bowen averaged 7.5. The lack of "D" from Arenas has already been mentioned and Stoudamire and Ewing's games are nothing alike. It's hard to compare any team to the Dream Team though, they had 10 of the top 50 all time NBA players on the same team.

Re: We Got Game    By hallucinator on 7/26/2006
chris mullin not a star? bruce bowen is a nice player but not half the player mullin was. mulliin was a perennial all-star and will be a hall of famer. bowen is just a defensevie specialist that can shoot threes and nothing else. in fact to compare any team to the 92 team is a joke. that was a team that was filled with hall of famers (sans laettner) that had all-around games and could adapt their styles to fit what their teams needed. That team would kill any international team playing today.

Re: We Got Game    By ThreeLions on 7/26/2006
Chris Paul will be good, but at this point he is nowhere near the in-his-prime Stockton that the Dream Team had. Both are pass-first point guards, so your comparison holds, but don't get carried away into thinking that this team would have a prayer against the original.

Re: We Got Game    By jay on 7/26/2006
Gil Arenas being a triple-double king? Maybe if you include turnovers in the equation instead if rebounds, by the way he plays no "D" either. I would take Hinrich over Arenas as my other point guard all day. Kirk's a better point guard, especially for FIBA play--he shoots better than Gil, is a better decision maker with the ball & is a superb defender. By the way I'm not sure why everyone thinks this team is so unselfish. That what they are saying right now in training camp, but everything is always so positive in training camp--wait til they have tight games & Coach K has to pare down his roster, see how they respond then. By the way, the days of the US dominating are over, they could easily go undefeated in this tourney, but they will not throttle all comers, there will be some tight games. By no means are they an "unstoppable force". Were they a force in 2000? That team was pretty good. Were they unstoppable in 2003? That team was as good. if not better than this year's team--and they nearly lost to Argentina in the early rounds. People need to stop with this unstoppable crap & realize the nuances of FIBA play. This current team is not really filled with deadeye shooters--Arenas is alright, Johnson is good but not as great as everyone thinks--Battier is probably the best long-range shooter they have & should be on the final roster. This team should see a steady diet of zones again, which is going to put a serious crimp in the strengthes of Wade, Paul, Arenas, & Lebron's game. Those guys are going to be dared to shoot from outside. They will more than likely not be living at the free throw line, like they do in the NBA.

Re: We Got Game    By madmathias on 7/26/2006
where's the coach k - chuck daly comparison? oh wait, there is none. another bronze medal in the waiting...

Re: We Got Game    By Really Confused Dude on 7/26/2006
LeBron led the league in triple doubles. What the heck are you doing saying Arenas is the new TD king? Holy crap.

That's worse than saying he plays great D, because you can check his triple double stats very easily.

Re: We Got Game    By Judd Fineberg on 7/26/2006
Honestly, Realistically... there is only one Jordan. While Wade is a force to be reckoned with, he is no MJ.

Re: We Got Game    By Greg on 7/26/2006
You missed one. Iverson is Isiah Thomas. Guards left off due to perceived attitude problems

Re: We Got Game    By deanraber on 7/26/2006
very good

Re: We Got Game    By LouD on 7/26/2006
sacreligious

Re: We Got Game    By Kyle D on 7/26/2006
Arenas was second in the league last year in total steals, which would constitute as good defense I believe.

Re: We Got Game    By Brian on 7/26/2006
Shane Battier is closer to Chris Mullin than Bowen as a pure "glue" guy. Also, he's a much better shooter and as good of an outside defender (maybe better when you take away the dirty play Bowen won't be able to get away with against international refs who don't care about his reputation as a specialist).

Re: We Got Game    By Sue Bird on 7/26/2006
There is not one aspect of Carmelo Anthony's "game" even close to Larry Bird's. Kelly Tripucka would be a more favorable comparison at this point, seriously.

Re: We Got Game    By pjdinho on 7/26/2006
Well done. My changes:
Mullin=Jamison as Mullin was *never* known for his defense and both of these players score tons of points.
Laettner=Battier c'mon the Duke thing is too much to pass on here.

Re: We Got Game    By CJ on 7/26/2006
Jay, you would take hinrich over arenas? Maybe you don't watch too much basketball, arenas averaged 29 points a game while taking 600 less shots than kobe bryant. To say he plays bad D, i didn't see hinrich blow past arenas in their 2005 playoffs series, not to mention hit the clutch shots arenas hit. And you have ever seen areanas play, you would know he is one of the best pure shooters in the league. I would take areanas hitting a half-courter before shaq hitting a free-throw

Re: We Got Game    By CJ on 7/26/2006
And although he is always a triple-double threat, Arenas is definitely not the triple-double king

Re: We Got Game    By Jay on 7/26/2006
Yes, CJ I would take Kirk over Arenas all day for FIBA ball. First off, Kirk is a better point guard than Arenas, period. I did not say a better NBA player or scorer but a better pure point. Kirk is just as good as a shooter as Gil. Um, did you watch Hinrich play vs. Wade. Go ask Wade what kind of defender Kirk is. Kirk is a much better decision maker than Gil with the ball as well. Some of the stats you failed to mention with Gil is his nearly 4 TOs per game, one of the highest in the league & he has been on top of that list for a couple years now. He also has one of the worst asst/to ratio for PGs in the league & has for the last couple years. And on top of that he has one of the worst shot selections in the NBA, probably the worst. What Arenas does do as well as anyone in the league is drive to the basket, he's basically unstoppable & he lives on the line. But you failed to realize the nuances of FIBA play where those driving lanes for the US should be clogged most of the time. So Gil will not be getting to line anywhere near to the degree that he does in the NBA. He's a good shooter but by no means one of the best shooters in the league. And by the way I've watched much more basketball than you can imagine, & pretty sure much more int'l ball than you & I understand the aspects that translate well between NBA & FIBA, & Hinrich makes much more sense. By the way to the dude who said Gil getting a lot of steals is a sign of good defense, thats the same logic that got Larry Hughes on 1st team defense, & its awful logic.

Re: We Got Game    By Jason on 7/27/2006
It's Dwyane Wade. Y before A.

Seriously.

Re: We Got Game    By Stern markets your soul on 7/27/2006
The caliber of the 92 team is unmatchable. In fact as far as player position and team chemistry, it would be hard to envision anyone on the 06 team displacing guys on the 92 roster (except Laettner). In fact players who didn't make the Dream team like Hardaway, KJ, Rodman, Price and Daugherty would probably be upgrades to most of the current roster. Dwight Howard=1992 t-rex Kevin Willis anyone?

Re: We Got Game    By nate25 on 7/29/2006
Arenas was #4 in steals this past season so he has some type of D.

Re: We Got Game    By Jay on 8/9/2006
Boy, this article looks pretty irrelavent now, like I thought it was in the first place. Hopefully, these insane comparsions to the Dream Team are put to bed. Did someone say their would be some tight games? Thank You very much. I am not sure why Deadspin links to this site--nothing special in the way on insight.

Re: We Got Game    By Cooch on 8/20/2006
like a rat on a Cheeto.

Re: We Got Game    By Cooch on 8/20/2006
like a rat on a Cheeto.

Re: We Got Game    By USA is number 4 on 9/19/2006
greek salad, yummy yummy.


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
  

 

    
Out of Bounds
    
Favorite Links